Thursday April 25, 2024
|
|
|
5.4.1 Jeopardizing the Charitable Interest
|
|
Purpose of Jeopardizing the Charitable Interest Rules
Private foundations and charitable remainder trusts are subject generally to the rules on jeopardizing the charitable interest. If a foundation manager or trustee were to invest in highly risky ways, it is possible that the investments could result in the loss of the foundation or trust principal. In that case, there would be nothing available to charity.
To minimize the temptation for trustees to engage in high-risk investments, Sec. 4944 creates several rules intended to facilitate prudent investment practices. These rules were created in response to the activities by some private foundation managers who used the private foundation assets to invest in high-risk businesses operated by friends or family. Since many of these businesses failed, the principal was lost, to the detriment of philanthropy. Thus, the guidelines are designed to encourage appropriate investment practices.
Definition of a Jeopardizing Investment
There is no specific definition of an investment that is termed a "jeopardizing" investment. The foundation manager is expected to consider the expected return (including both income and appreciation of capital), the risks of rising and falling price levels and the need for diversification.
While no specific investment is excluded, there is a class of risky investments that will be closely scrutinized. These include trading in securities on margin; trading in commodity futures; investments in working interests in oil and gas wells; the purchase of "puts," "calls," "straddles" and warrants and selling short. Reg. 53.4944-1(a)(2).
Jeopardizing Investment Taxes
If a private foundation makes an investment that jeopardizes its exempt purpose, there is a tax of 10% on the amount invested. The 10% could be levied each year on the jeopardizing investments.
In addition, the manager who makes the investment could potentially be subject to 10% tax on that investment, up to $10,000. The tax for a manager applies if the manager "knowing" the risky nature of the investment decides to move forward with that particular asset. Knowing is defined as actual knowledge of sufficient facts, awareness that the circumstances may violate the federal tax law or negligence in attempting to understand the risks involved.
If the 10% tax is imposed on a foundation and the foundation does not transfer the investment, there could be a second-level tax equal to 25% of the amount of the investment. This tax would also be paid by the private foundation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
© Copyright 1999-2024 Crescendo Interactive, Inc.
|
|