Wednesday, April 24, 2024
GiftLaw Pro
GiftLaw Note: H and W established two irrevocable trusts. Trust 1 is for the benefit of D and her descendents and Trust is for the benefit of S and his descendents. After funding the trusts, H and W filed Form 709, the United States Gift and Generation Skipping Transfer Tax Form. H and W elected to treat the gifts as made one-half by H and one-half by W as permitted under Sec. 2513. However, in the preparation of Form 709, Accountant failed to allocate any generation skipping tax (GST) exemption to H or W. Accountant subsequently discovered the mistake. H and W petitioned the Service for an extension of time to allocate their GST exemptions to trusts 1 and 2. Sec. 2631(a) of the Code provides every person with a GST exemption. Sub Section (b) states that once made, the election is irrevocable. The amount of the applicable exemption is listed in Sec. 2010(c). Furthermore, Sec. 2642(b)(1) provides that once the Form 709 is filed, the value listed is final. However, the Service noted that Sec. 2642(g)(1)(B) that the Secretary of the Treasury may prescribe the circumstances and procedures under which the Service may allow a taxpayer additional time to allocate his or her GST exemption. Accordingly, Sec. 301.9100-1(c) of the Treasury Regulations allows the commissioner of the IRS discretion to grant such extensions. However, in order to be granted such an extension, the requesting taxpayer must establish that he or she acted reasonably and in good faith and that granting the relief will not prejudice the interests of the government. Under Sec. 3019100-3(b)(1)(v) a taxpayer is deemed to have acted reasonably and in good faith if he or she relied on a qualified tax professional and the professional failed to make the election. The Service concluded that the elements of Treasury Regulation Sec. 301.9100-3 were met and as such an extension to file for the GST exemption was granted.

Editor's Note: The extension to allocate the GST exemption may not exceed six months and will only be granted if the taxpayer has filed Form 709 on or before the required filing date set under Sec. 6075(b). As with all tax forms, attention should be given to ensure timely filing of Form 709 to avoid oversights and penalties.
Dear * * *:

This is in response to a letter from your authorized representative dated October 19, 2005, and prior correspondence, requesting an extension of time under § 301.9100 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations to make allocations of generation- skipping transfer (GST) exemption.

The facts and representations submitted are summarized as follows: Husband established two irrevocable trusts, Trust 1 and Trust 2, on Date. Trust 1 is for the benefit of Daughter and her descendants, and Trust 2 is for the benefit of Son and his descendants. In Year, Husband transferred x valued at Amount to each trust.

Accounting Firm prepared and Husband and Wife filed separate Forms 709 (United States Gift (and Generation-Skipping Transfer) Tax Return) for Year. Husband and Wife each elected to treat the gifts as made one-half by Husband and one-half by Wife as permitted under § 2513. However, in the preparation of the Forms 709, Accounting Firm inadvertently failed to allocate any GST exemption on Husband's or Wife's Form 709. Accounting Firm recently discovered the errors while preparing subsequent gift tax returns for Husband and Wife.

To date, no taxable distributions or taxable terminations have occurred with respect to Trust 1 or Trust 2. Husband and Wife are United States citizens. Husband and Wife have sufficient GST exemption remaining to allocate to Trust 1 and Trust 2.

You request an extension of time to allocate your available GST exemption to the gifts made to Trust 1 and Trust 2 in Year.

LAW AND ANALYSIS


Section 2601 imposes a tax on every generation-skipping transfer. A generation-skipping transfer is defined under § 2611(a) as (1) a taxable distribution, (2) a taxable termination, and (3) a direct skip.

Section 2631(a), as in effect for the tax years at issue, provided that, for purposes of determining the GST tax, every individual shall be allowed a GST exemption of $1,000,000 (adjusted for inflation under § 2631(c)) which may be allocated by such individual (or his executor) to any property with respect to which such individual is the transferor. Section 2631(b) provides that any allocation under § 2631(a), once made, shall be irrevocable.

Section 2652(a)(2) and § 26.2652-1(a)(4) of the Generation- Skipping Transfer Tax Regulations provide that, if, under § 2513, one-half of a gift is treated as made by an individual and one-half is treated as made by the spouse of the individual, then for purposes of the GST tax, each spouse is treated as the transferor of one-half of the entire value of the property transferred by the donor spouse, regardless of the interest the electing spouse is actually deemed to have transferred under § 2513.

Section 2632(a) provides that any allocation by an individual of his or her GST exemption under § 2631(a) may be made at any time on or before the date prescribed for filing the estate tax return for such individual's estate (determined with regard to extensions), regardless of whether such a return is required to be filed.

Section 26.2632-1(b)(2) provides that an allocation of GST exemption to property transferred during the transferor's lifetime, other than in a direct skip, is made on Form 709.

Section 2642(b)(1) provides that, except as provided in § 2642(f), if the allocation of the GST exemption to any transfers of property is made on a gift tax return filed on or before the date prescribed by § 6075(b) for such transfer the value of such property for purposes of § 2642(a) shall be its value as finally determined for purposes of chapter 12 (within the meaning of § 2001(f)(2)).

Section 2642(g)(1)(A) provides that the Secretary shall by regulation prescribe such circumstances and procedures under which extensions of time will be granted to make an allocation of GST exemption described in § 2642(b)(1) or (2).

Section 2642(g)(1)(B) provides that in determining whether to grant relief under this paragraph, the Secretary shall take into account all relevant circumstances, including evidence of intent contained in the trust instrument or instrument of transfer and such other factors as the Secretary deems relevant. For purposes of determining whether to grant relief under this paragraph, the time for making the allocation (or election) shall be treated as if not expressly prescribed by statute. See Notice 2001-50, 2001-2 C.B. 189.

Section 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner has discretion to grant a reasonable extension of time under the rules set forth in §§ 301.9100-2 and 301.9100-3 to make a regulatory election, or a statutory election (but no more than 6 months except in the case of a taxpayer who is abroad), under all subtitles of the Internal Revenue Code except subtitles E, G, H, and I.

Section 301.9100-3 provides the standards used to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make an election whose date is prescribed by a regulation (and not expressly provided by statute). Under § 301.9100-1(b), a regulatory election includes an election whose due date is prescribed by a notice published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin. In accordance with § 2642(g)(1)(B) and Notice 2001-50, taxpayers may seek an extension of time to make an allocation described in § 2642(b)(1) under the provisions of § 301.9100-3.

Requests for relief under § 301.9100-3 will be granted when the taxpayer provides the evidence to establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and that granting relief will not prejudice the interests of the government.

Section 301.9100-3(b)(1)(v) provides that a taxpayer is deemed to have acted reasonably and in good faith if the taxpayer reasonably relied on a qualified tax professional, including a tax professional employed by the taxpayer, and the tax professional failed to make, or advise the taxpayer to make, the election.

Based on the facts submitted and the representations made, we conclude that the requirements of § 301.9100-3 have been satisfied. Under § 26.2652-1(a)(4), Wife is treated, for GST purposes, as the transferor of one-half of the entire value of the property transferred by Husband, regardless of the interest Wife is actually deemed to have transferred under § 2513. For GST purposes, Husband and Wife are each treated as the transferor of one- half of the value of the entire property transferred to Trust 1 and Trust 2. Therefore, Husband is granted an extension of time of 60 days from the date of this letter to make an allocation of Husband's available GST exemption, with respect to Husband's transfers to Trust 1 and Trust 2 in Year. In addition, Wife is granted an extension of time of 60 days from the date of this letter to make an allocation of Wife's available GST exemption, with respect to the transfers to Trust 1 and Trust 2 in Year. The allocations will be effective as of the respective date of the transfers, and the inclusion ratios of Trust 1 and Trust 2 will be determined based on the value of the transfers to the trusts as determined for federal gift tax purposes and the amount of exemption allocated to the trusts. Further, the value of the transferred assets to Trusts 1 and 2 as of the respective date of the original transfers to Trusts 1 and 2 will be used in determining the amount of Husband's and Wife's GST exemption to be allocated to Trusts 1 and 2.

Husband and Wife should make these allocations on supplemental Forms 709 for Year. The forms should be filed with the Cincinnati Service Center at the following address: Internal Revenue Service, Cincinnati Service Center -- Stop 82, Cincinnati, OH 45999. A copy of this letter should be attached to the forms.

The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on examination.

Except as specifically ruled herein, we express or imply no opinion on the federal tax consequences of the transaction under the cited provisions or under any other provisions of the Code.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

Sincerely,

Heather C. Maloy, Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs and Special Industries)Enclosures

Related Topics On Extension Granted to Make GSTT Exemption Allocations

1.4.1  Generation-Skipping Transfer Tax Overview:    The Generation-Skipping Transfer Tax (GSTT) is applicable for a transfer to a skip person. A skip person is a descendent two or more generations away from the transferor - usually a grandchild or a great-grandchild. Sec. 2613(a). If the beneficiary is not a grandchild or a great-grandchild, then the second generation is defined as a person 37½ or more years younger than the decedent. However, if a child is deceased, then that child's children will be considered as moving up to the child's generation. Sec. 2651(e).


1.4.2  Exclusion and Exemption:    The annual gift tax exclusion applies in limited cases to generation-skipping transfer taxes. Sec. 2642(c)(3)(A). The exclusion applies to direct transfers. It also applies to transfers in trust in which all principal and income is paid only to the skip person and the assets are either distributed to the skip person during life or to his or her estate.



© Copyright 1999-2024 Crescendo Interactive, Inc.