Friday, March 29, 2024
GiftLaw Pro
GiftLaw Note: Taxpayer was executor of her mother's estate, which consisted of five IRA accounts. Unfortunately, Taxpayer's mother did not name a designated beneficiary on any of her IRA accounts. Not wishing the negative implications inherent in this situation, Taxpayer, as executor of her mother's estate, established another IRA account in her mother's name and attempted to roll over the five IRA accounts into the newly created IRA account. In addition, Taxpayer named herself as the designated beneficiary of the newly created IRA account.

Taxpayer now requests a ruling that her beneficiary designation was timely and properly made. Further, Taxpayer wishes to elect to "stretch" the IRA payments over her life expectancy.

After briefly outlining IRC Sec. 401(a)(9), the Service quickly concluded that a surviving spouse may elect to roll over an IRA account received from her deceased husband; however, an executor may not exercise this election after the surviving spouse's death. Here, Taxpayer attempted to do just that when she created a new IRA account to be the recipient of her mother's five IRA accounts. In addition, the Service held that a beneficiary must be designated by an IRA owner or a surviving spouse of an IRA owner. Furthermore, the Service stated that neither the Code nor regulations provide that the executor may designate herself as the beneficiary of the surviving spouse's IRAs where the surviving spouse elected to treat the IRAs of her deceased husband as her own. Consequently, the Service ruled that the executor's beneficiary designation was not timely or properly made. Additionally, Taxpayer may not elect to "stretch" the IRA payments over her life expectancy because she was not a designated beneficiary.

Editor's Note: This PLR illustrates the harsh consequences that occur when IRA owners fail to designate beneficiaries of their IRAs. If no beneficiaries are named, the opportunity to minimize the heavy tax burden associated with IRAs is lost. In addition, the ability to benefit charity is also lost. Thus, it is important to advise clients to timely and properly designate beneficiaries of their IRAs.

Dear * * *

This is in response to the * * *, request for letter rulings submitted on your behalf by your authorized representative, as supplemented by correspondence dated * * *, in which you, through your authorized representative, request a series of letter rulings under sections 408(d), 401(a)(9), and 4973 of the Internal Revenue Code. The following facts and representations support your ruling request.

Taxpayer A, whose date of birth was Date 1, 1925, died on Date 2, 1999, having attained age 70 1/2. Taxpayer A was survived by his wife, Taxpayer B, whose date of birth was Date 3, 1929. Pursuant to the will of Taxpayer A, Taxpayer B was the sole executrix of Taxpayer A's estate.

The provisions of Taxpayer A's will provided, in relevant part, that after a bequest, not to exceed $250,000, to Taxpayer C, Taxpayer A's daughter, the rest, residue, and remainder of Taxpayer A's estate was to go to Taxpayer B if she survived Taxpayer A. Taxpayer B survived Taxpayer A.

At his death, Taxpayer A maintained seven individual retirement arrangements (IRAs), IRAs T through Z. The estate of Taxpayer A was the beneficiary of his IRAs T and U. Taxpayer B was the named beneficiary of his IRAs V through Z.

During calendar year 1999, Taxpayer A received a distribution from his IRA X in the amount of Sum 4 which, your authorized representative asserts, did not satisfy the requirements of section 401(a)(9) of the Internal Revenue Code which are applicable to IRAs pursuant to Code section 408(a)(6). Taxpayer A received no distribution during calendar year 1999 from either IRA V, IRA W, IRA Y, or IRA Z.

During calendar year 1999, Taxpayer B did not receive any distribution from any of the IRAs (IRAs T, U, V, W, X, Y, and Z) referenced above which were maintained by Taxpayer A at his death.

On or about Date 5, 2000, Taxpayer B received a distribution in the amount of Sum 1 from IRA Z of which she was the beneficiary as noted above. On or about Date 6, 2000, the proceeds of IRA T, in the amount of Sum 2, were received by the estate of Taxpayer A on behalf of Taxpayer B, the residuary beneficiary of Taxpayer A's estate. Additionally, on or about Date 6, 2000, the proceeds of IRA U, in the amount of Sum 3, were received by the estate of Taxpayer A on behalf of Taxpayer B, the residuary beneficiary of Taxpayer A's estate.

Taxpayer B died or Date 4, 2000, which date was after both Date 5 and Date 6. On or about Date 7, 2000, Taxpayer C was appointed successor executrix of the estate of Taxpayer A. On or about Date 8, 2000, Taxpayer C was appointed the executrix of the estate of Taxpayer B.

Prior to her date of death, Date 4, 2000, Taxpayer B had not received any distribution during calendar year 2000 from either IRA V, IRA W, IRA X, or IRA Y.

On or about Date 9, 2000, which date was after the date of death of Taxpayer B, Taxpayer C, in her capacity of executrix of the estate of Taxpayer B, established IRA S in the name of Taxpayer B, deceased, for the benefit of Taxpayer C, named beneficiary thereof. Additionally, on or about Date 9, 2000, Taxpayer C, in her capacity of executrix of the estate of Taxpayer B, contributed, as an attempted rollover, into IRA S the proceeds received by Taxpayer B on or about Date 5, 2000, in the amount of Sum 1, from IRA Z.

On or about Date 10, 2000, which date was after the date of death of Taxpayer B, Taxpayer C, in her capacities of executrix of the estate of Taxpayer A and of executrix of the estate of Taxpayer B, contributed, as attempted rollover contributions, into IRA S, the amounts which had been distributed from IRAs T and U to the estate of Taxpayer A on Date 6, 2000, as noted above.

Your authorized representative has asserted, on your behalf, that, prior to her death, Taxpayer B had not named or designated a beneficiary with respect to her interests, if any, in IRAs V through Z.

Based on the above, you, through your authorized representative, request the following letter rulings:
  1. that Taxpayer C was timely and properly designated the beneficiary of IRA S
  2. that Taxpayer C, in her capacity of beneficiary of IRA S, may elect to receive Code section 401(a)(9) minimum required distributions from said IRA S over her life expectancy.
With respect to your ruling requests, section 408(a)(6) of the Code provides that, under regulations prescribed by the Secretary, rules similar to the rules of section 401(a)(9) and the incidental death benefit requirements of section 401(a) shall apply to the distribution of the entire interest of an individual for whose benefit the IRA trust is maintained.

Code section 401(a)(9)(A) provides, in general, that a trust will not be considered qualified unless the plan provides that the entire interest of each employee --
  1. will be distributed to such employee not later than the required beginning date, or
  2. will be distributed, beginning not later than the required beginning date, over the life of such employee or over the lives of such employee and a designated beneficiary or over a period not extending beyond the life expectancy of such employee and a designated beneficiary.
Code section 401(a)(9)(B)(ii) provides, in general, that if an employee dies prior to the date required distributions have begun without having designated a beneficiary of his plan (IRA) interest, distribution of such plan or IRA interest must be made within 5 years of the death of the employee (IRA holder).

Code section 401(a)(9)(B)(iii) provides, in general, for an exception to the above-referenced five-year rule. Under this exception, distributions may be made to a timely designated beneficiary over the beneficiary's life (or life expectancy) as long as said distributions begin not later than one year after the date of the employee's (IRA holder's) death.

Section 401(a)(9)-1 of the Proposed Income Tax Regulations, Question and Answer C-2 provided, in general, that there will be compliance with the above referenced five-year rule as long as distribution of the employee's (IRA holder's) entire interest is made by December 31 of the calendar year which contains the fifth anniversary of the death of the employee or IRA holder.

Section 401(a)(9)-1 of the Proposed Income Tax Regulations, Question and Answer C-3 provided, in general, that there will be compliance with the above referenced exception to the five- year rule as long as distribution of the employee's (IRA holder's) entire interest is made to a non-spousal beneficiary beginning no later than December 31 of the calendar year following the calendar year of the employee's (IRA holder's) death.

Section 401(a)(9)(C) of the Code provides, in relevant part, that, for purposes of this paragraph, the term "required beginning date" means April 1 of the calendar year following the calendar year in which the employee (IRA holder) attains age 70 1/2.

Section 1.101(a)(9)-l of the Proposed Income Tax Regulations, Questions and Answers D-1 and D-2 provided, in general, that designated beneficiaries are individuals who are designated by either a plan participant or IRA holder to receive benefits under a plan or from an IRA. Such designation may be made pursuant to plan provisions or by means of an affirmative election by the employee or IRA holder, or, in limited circumstances, by the surviving spouse of an employee or IRA holder, which election specifies the beneficiary.

Section 1.401(a)(9)-1 of the Proposed Income Tax Regulations, Question and Answer D-2A provided, in pertinent part, that an estate may not be a designated beneficiary for purposes of Code section 401(a)(9).

Section 401(a)(9)-l of the Proposed Income Tax Regulations, Question and Answer D-3, provided that for purposes of calculating the distribution period for distributions that begin prior to death, the designated beneficiary will be determined as of the plan participant's (IRA holder's) required beginning date.

The ability of a surviving spouse to either roll over the IRA of her deceased husband into an IRA set up and maintained in her name or to treat said IRA of the decedent as her own is personal to the surviving spouse and may not be exercised by the executrix of her estate after her death.

With respect to your ruling requests, as noted above, a beneficiary must be designated either by a plan participant, an IRA holder or, in limited circumstances, the surviving spouse of said participant or IRA holder. Neither the Code nor the proposed income tax regulations, promulgated thereunder, provide that the executrix of the estate of a surviving spouse who elected to treat IRAs of her deceased husband as her own may designate herself as the beneficiary of the surviving spouse's IRAs.

Thus, with respect to your ruling requests, the Service concludes as follows:
  1. that Taxpayer C was not timely and properly designated the beneficiary of IRA S; and
  2. that since Taxpayer C, is not the designated beneficiary of IRA S, she may not elect to receive Code section 401(a)(9) minimum required distributions from said IRA S over her life expectancy.
This ruling letter assumes that Taxpayer A's IRAs T, U, and Z had met the requirements of Code section 408(a) at all times relevant thereto.

This ruling is directed solely to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited by others as precedent.

Please note that this letter ruling does not address the changes to sections 1.401(a)(9) and 1.408-8 of the proposed regulations which were published in the Federal Register on January 17, 2001.

Pursuant to a power of attorney on file in this office, a copy of this letter ruling is being sent to your authorized representative.

Sincerely yours,

Frances V. Sloan
Manager, Employee Plans
Technical Group 3
Tax Exempt and Government
Entities Division




© Copyright 1999-2024 Crescendo Interactive, Inc.